[elektro-etc] hogy van ez?

[Arnold Fuzesi]

Hmm, koszi a helyreigazitast, rosszul tudtam ezekszerint. (Vagy teszemazt az uj trendek nem ezt mutatjak, 70%-ot is olvastam vhol, h annyi bebit metelnek korul Minnesotaban pl. De eddig varosi divatnak tunt szamomra...lehet regebbre nyulik vissza, es az arany meg nem ezt mutatja, hogy uj ertelmet kapott a varosi nep szamara...)

"And yet, the pendulum is already swinging back. Earlier this year, the New York Times published a front-page story noting that the Centers for Disease Control was considering recommending routine circumcision to help stop the spread of AIDS. The idea was based largely on studies done in Africa indicating that circumcised heterosexual men were at least 60 percent less susceptible to HIV than uncircumcised ones. The story promptly touched off a firestorm, with pro- and anti-circumcision commenters exchanging angry barbs. The CDC will now say only that it’s in the process of determining a recommendation."

60%, az komoly. Igazabol nem ertem...
Elszarusodik a bor :) es nem tud bejutni a virus, vagy hogy mukodik????
Töfi utan gondolom csak megmossa az ember...foleg idegen no eseten. Nemertem...

Arnold
Sent from my iPhone

On 2012.07.28., at 10:19, Kaczmarek Edvard <edk-eletc at babakezek.hu> wrote:

> 
>> Nem, total nem. Fehernep, abbol is az "urbanusabb" fajta.
> 
> Pont nem. ,,There was also significant variation between rural and urban areas. Rural areas reported an incidence of circumcision of 66.9% while urban areas reported an incidence of 41.2%'' (2009)
> 
> Ed
>