[elektro-etc] Szetszedtem 143

Dexter charles.hoss at gmail.com
Mon Jan 7 13:03:32 CET 2008


Istvan Kovacs írta:
>> Tehát a kérdés: tudnak maguk a maguk nyelvén röhögni úgy, ahogy mi a 
>> mienken?
>
> Nagyon valószínű...
> Én ezen mindig könnyesre röhögöm magam:
> (általam ismeretlen szerző tollából, és elnézést a hossza miatt)


meg par lepes es eljutnak egy afrikaans , holland keverekhez :)

bye
dexter

>
> 8<-----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>     Having chosen English as the preferred language in the EEC (now
>     officially the European Union, or EU), the European Parliament has
>     commissioned a feasability study in ways of improving efficiency in
>     communications between Government departments.
>
>     European officials have often pointed out that English spelling is
>     unnecessary difficult; for example: cough, plough, rough, through
>     and thorough. What is clearly needed is a phased programme of
>     changes to iron out these anomalies. The programme would, of
>     course, be administered by a committee staff at top level by
>     participating nations.
>
>     In the first year, for example, the committee would suggest using
>     's' instead of the soft 'c'. Sertainly, sivil servants in all
>     sities would resieve this news with joy. Then the hard 'c' could be
>     replaced by 'k' sinse both letters are pronounsed alike. Not only
>     would this klear up konfusion in the minds of klerikal workers, but
>     typewriters kould be made with one less letter.
>
>     There would be growing enthusiasm when in the sekond year, it was
>     anounsed that the troublesome 'ph' would henseforth be written 'f'.
>     This would make words like 'fotograf' twenty persent shorter in
>     print.
>
>     In the third year, publik akseptanse of the new spelling kan be
>     expekted to reach the stage where more komplikated changes are
>     possible. Governments would enkourage the removal of double letters
>     which have always been a deterent to akurate speling.
>
>     We would al agre that the horible mes of silent 'e's in the languag
>     is disgrasful. Therefor we kould drop thes and kontinu to read and
>     writ as though nothing had hapend. By this tim it would be four
>     years sins the skem began and peopl would be reseptive to steps
>     sutsh as replasing 'th' by 'z'. Perhaps zen ze funktion of 'w'
>     kould be taken on by 'v', vitsh is, after al, half a 'w'. Shortly
>     after zis, ze unesesary 'o' kould be dropd from words kontaining
>     'ou'. Similar arguments vud of kors be aplid to ozer kombinations
>     of leters.
>
>     Kontinuing zis proses yer after yer, ve vud eventuli hav a reli
>     sensibl riten styl. After tventi yers zer vud be no mor trubls,
>     difikultis and evrivun vud fin it ezi tu understand ech ozer. Ze
>     drems of the Guvermnt vud finali hav kum tru.
>
> 8<-----------------------------------------------------------------
>



More information about the Elektro-etc mailing list